With my A levels in English and French, and the results I achieved at the end of this year in Spanish and Latin, I was successful in gaining exemption from the whole first year of Intermediate studies for an arts degree, and could start at the LSE (when I eventually got a place) at the beginning of the two-year Sociology course. Incidentally, I don't believe I could have passed the Latin set book exam without the help of the shorthand I had learned in the previous year. As we worked through the book translating it in class, I made a record of the translation in shorthand, and then attempted to learn the whole thing by heart. It must have done the trick! Now was the time for me to do the LSE entrance exam.
My own view of my performance in the exam was that it was pitiful - I already felt myself to be out of my depth with the questions that were asked. However, to my surprise, I was offered a place on the Sociology course starting in the autumn of 1947. To this day I wonder if any influence was brought to bear in my favour. My history teacher at school had encouraged and helped me to apply for a place, and before I came to take the entrance exam, he had, as it turned out, left the school and taken an appointment as a lecturer at the LSE. I thought a great deal of this teacher - the more so when he married my beloved biology teacher. He was not the sort of man whom I would have expected to do anything that was not utterly straightforward, but my confidence in my own performance was such that I almost have to believe that he did.
I had not relied solely on my hope of getting a place at the LSE, but had applied also for a Social Sciences course at Manchester University, and had gone up there for an interview. It is strange the things that stick in one's mind about certain occasions. I remember little of Manchester, the University or the interview, but I have to this day a brilliant picture in my mind of a shop window, where I spotted the very sandals that I had been looking for all summer, creamy white and gleaming, which I bore home with me with a triumph much greater than that of being offered a place shortly afterwards. There had been another pair of shoes which were a perfect buy, and which threw a lasting glow over my time in the secretarial college - brown leather and suede, with a two-hole lace-up in front and a small heel, both comfortable and smart. Then there were the blue and white lace-ups with chunky heels that supported me through the summer that I developed arthritis in my ankle, and could no longer wear flatties. But this isn't really about shoes .......!
I wish I had chosen Manchester. I think I would probably have understood the course subjects in Social Sciences, and would have adjusted happily to living amongst Mancunians, no doubt adopting the local vowels, as I did in Cheshire many years later. (I was a linguist by natural talent, after all.) I might actually have graduated, and who knows where my life might have gone. But I chose to stay in London and go to The London School of Economics, because I had met and fallen in love with Michael, the man I did not marry until nine years later, but to whom I remained married for 50 years, until he died just two years ago. The story of Michael is really a tale on its own, which may never be written here, but these notes cannot be written without him.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
9 comments:
What strange comments above- perhaps you should switch to moderated for a while? In any case, I am really enjoying your story. I even like the bit about shoes;)
Good suggestion,G,I shall try it at once. This happened a few days ago and I hoped it was a freak error. I don't think these people can actually be reading my blog, their comments just don't make sense.
Actually, I've gone for word verification, which is less trouble for me. We'll see what happens.
Just want to say hi, Judith. I am enjoying your blogs so much. I just subscribed to both(Another Yankee, for goodness sakes). I found you on Julie's comment page and left a message for you, there, today. I think we'd have a lot in common, anyway, but our age DOES make a bond-- I'm 75.
annie
Hullo Annie, nice to hear from you. I'm not quite clear from your comment whether you yourself are a Yankee, or whether you are saying you will register as a Yankee reader because you are using Google Reader.
Yes, I'm a New England Yankee who has been transplanted to/in (?) Texas since I retired, and now live on a farm-ranch near my 4- and- 1/2-year-old grandson. I discovered all these inspiring and fun art blogs
on the Internet since moving here, and just discovered yours, the other day, on Julie Oakley's comment page.
Ah, you've continued your life story. Very interesting. How wonderful the blog world is, allowing us to share others' lives like this.
I haven't looked at this blog for a while. It's so interesting and such a gift for your children and grandchildren. We must sort out that drive soon - maybe next week?
That would be nice, Julie, I'll make a note to ring you. In fact I have an ongoing note to ring you but what with one thing and another...............!!!
Post a Comment